Skip to main content
Save 30% on your first year

Smartbills vs Zip

Zip orchestrates the approval before a purchase. Somebody still has to end up with the receipt, the coded entry and the ledger sync afterwards.

At a glance

Smartbills vs Zip, in one screen

Zip puts a single intake in front of the procurement, legal, security and finance processes a company already runs, routes each request to the right approvers and tracks it across those systems. It is bought where the problem is fragmentation.

Smartbills

Best for

Organizations that need the receipt, the coded entry and the ledger sync, not only the approval that came before it.

Where it's stronger

  • The work after the approval, from capture through to posting, is the whole product.
  • Spend that never enters an intake process is still captured and controlled.
  • Expenses, payables and receivables post to one accounting system after approval.
  • Line-level evidence is attached to every entry, not filed somewhere separate.

Zip

Best for

Larger companies where a single purchase touches five teams and nobody can say which one is holding it up.

Where it's stronger

  • Cross-functional intake across legal, security, IT and finance is something Smartbills does not attempt.
  • Zip integrates far more broadly into existing procurement and ERP estates.
  • Showing exactly where a request is stuck solves a genuine large-company pain.
  • If you already own every system and cannot see across them, Zip is the answer.

Every comparison on this site names what the other product does better. If we couldn't think of anything, we didn't publish the page.

Side by side

Smartbills and Zip, feature by feature

These are structural differences, not plan checkboxes. Capabilities change, so check the vendor's own documentation before deciding on any single row.

One front door for every purchase request

SmartbillsBill and expense approvals only
ZipTheir core product, far deeper

Connecting to existing procurement and ERP systems

SmartbillsNarrower
ZipVery broad

Itemized receipts issued by the merchant

Smartbills
Zip—

Capturing, coding and approving invoices

Smartbills
ZipThrough connected systems

Employee expenses and reimbursements

Smartbills
Zip—

Applying customer payments to invoices

Smartbills
Zip—

Fit for large, fragmented organizations

SmartbillsLess so
ZipExactly the design point

Moving from Zip

None of this needs a big-bang cutover. Most teams run both tools for one cycle and compare capture rates before switching anyone off.

  1. It isn't either/or

    Intake and capture solve different halves of the same problem, and many companies run both.

  2. Follow one purchase

    Track one approved purchase through to a posted entry and count the manual steps after approval.

  3. Capture what intake never sees

    Card and in-person purchases never enter intake. Start where you have no coverage at all.

  4. Decide where bills live

    One system should own supplier bill capture, coding and approval, or you'll reconcile two of them forever.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What people ask us before they sign up.

Only partially. Zip orchestrates approvals across the systems you already run, while Smartbills captures, codes and posts the spend itself. Most buyers end up wanting one of each.

Yes, and for a large organization that is usually the right arrangement. Zip routes the request; Smartbills turns the resulting bill or receipt into a coded, approved accounting entry.

No. Smartbills approves bills and expenses, not purchase requests. Zip handles the request, and Smartbills handles the bill and the receipt that arrive afterwards.

Get started

Ready to see it against Zip?

Bring one month of your own receipts and card transactions, and we'll show you the capture rate on both sides instead of a slide deck.