Skip to main content
Save 30% on your first year

Smartbills vs Paystand

Paystand is built around money coming in. Smartbills handles the document attached to money going out, which is why teams often run both.

At a glance

Smartbills vs Paystand, in one screen

Paystand is a B2B payments platform built on the receivable: digital invoicing, a payment portal, collections and automatic cash reconciliation over its own bank-to-bank network, on a flat subscription instead of per-transaction fees. Since acquiring Teampay in April 2024 it also sells cards and spend management.

Smartbills

Best for

Teams whose problem is the document attached to money going out, not the speed of money coming in.

Where it's stronger

  • Receipts arrive as structured data rather than being collected from employees.
  • Cards, expenses and their receipts are one system instead of two products.
  • The tax-recoverable lines are identifiable without anyone reading an image.
  • The receipt also feeds loyalty and pay at table.

Paystand

Best for

Companies whose expensive problem is getting paid: large invoices, interchange fees and slow cash.

Where it's stronger

  • Attacks card interchange with a flat subscription on its own payment network.
  • Mature receivables, with deeper automatic reconciliation into heavy ERPs than ours.
  • Receiving rails, cheque scanning and lockbox match how customers actually pay.
  • A larger, longer-established company, with both sides of the ledger since Teampay.

Every comparison on this site names what the other product does better. If we couldn't think of anything, we didn't publish the page.

Side by side

Smartbills and Paystand, feature by feature

These are structural differences, not plan checkboxes. Capabilities change, so check the vendor's own documentation before deciding on any single row.

Who produces the receipt

We can only describe what Paystand publishes. Ask them for the detail.

SmartbillsIssued by the merchant at the point of sale, as data
PaystandEmployee-supplied; capture is not detailed publicly

Customer payments and cash application

Smartbills
PaystandTheir core strength

How customers can pay you

SmartbillsNarrower
PaystandACH, eCheck, card, Canadian EFT, cheque scan, lockbox

A flat fee instead of card interchange

Their central commercial argument, and a real one on large invoices.

Smartbills—
Paystand

Corporate cards and spending controls

Smartbills
PaystandThrough Teampay by Paystand

Expense claims and reimbursements

Smartbills
Paystand

Itemized receipts issued by the merchant

Smartbills
Paystand—

Accounting systems it connects to

SmartbillsQuickBooks, Xero, Sage and others
PaystandNetSuite, Sage Intacct/300/100/X3, Dynamics 365, Acumatica, QuickBooks, Xero

Moving from Paystand

None of this needs a big-bang cutover. Most teams run both tools for one cycle and compare capture rates before switching anyone off.

  1. Find which side hurts

    If money coming in is the costly problem, buy Paystand and stop reading here.

  2. Connect your ledger

    Connect the ledger Paystand already syncs with and map categories and tax codes once.

  3. Run capture in parallel

    Give it one cycle, then count how many card transactions ended up itemized.

  4. Keep the collections rail

    Moving capture changes nothing about how your customers pay you.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What people ask us before they sign up.

For most companies, no. Paystand's core is receivables and ours is the document attached to spend. The only real overlap is Teampay.

Its published documentation describes spend controls and audit trails but not receipt capture. That is missing detail rather than proof of absence. Ask them directly.

Yes. Collections with them, capture and cards with us, and one ledger underneath both.

Get started

Ready to see it against Paystand?

Bring one month of your own receipts and card transactions, and we'll show you the capture rate on both sides instead of a slide deck.