Skip to main content
Save 30% on your first year

Smartbills vs Payhawk

Payhawk consolidates reporting across your entities. Smartbills works one layer down, on the receipts underneath that reporting, in each entity.

At a glance

Smartbills vs Payhawk, in one screen

Payhawk combines corporate cards, expense management and payments with unusually strong multi-entity and multi-currency handling, including consolidated views across subsidiaries and entity-level reporting. It targets finance teams running several legal entities in different countries, and it has been adding tools for chasing receipts and clearing blocked transactions.

Smartbills

Best for

Groups that want the receipt under every transaction to be structured data in every entity. Consolidation rests on evidence instead of photos.

Where it's stronger

  • In every entity, the document under the report is structured data instead of a photo.
  • Capture runs on existing card programs. There's no card migration country by country.
  • Receivables, rebilling and cash application on the same ledger as spend.
  • Tax categories come from the line items themselves.

Payhawk

Best for

Choose Payhawk if your defining constraint is consolidating spend across many legal entities and currencies, where its reporting is well ahead of ours.

Where it's stronger

  • Multi-entity consolidation and entity-level reporting are excellent and well ahead of ours.
  • Multi-currency handling and European banking coverage built for groups in many countries.
  • A more complete controller product: budgets, approval matrices and close tooling.
  • With fifteen subsidiaries in nine currencies, Payhawk solves it today, where we'd be a project.

Every comparison on this site names what the other product does better. If we couldn't think of anything, we didn't publish the page.

Side by side

Smartbills and Payhawk, feature by feature

These are structural differences, not plan checkboxes. Capabilities change, so check the vendor's own documentation before deciding on any single row.

Consolidating many entities and currencies

SmartbillsMulti-entity, less mature
PayhawkA core strength

Corporate cards with policy controls

Smartbills
Payhawk

Chasing receipts that are still missing

SmartbillsChasing, plus receipts that need none
Payhawk

Receipts issued by the merchant

Smartbills
Payhawk—

Line items without reading an image

Smartbills
Payhawk—

Receivables and rebilling

Smartbills
Payhawk—

European banking and payment coverage

SmartbillsNarrower today
PayhawkBroad, across currencies and entities

Moving from Payhawk

None of this needs a big-bang cutover. Most teams run both tools for one cycle and compare capture rates before switching anyone off.

  1. Start with one entity

    Prove capture in the entity with the messiest receipts. That's where the difference shows within one cycle.

  2. Keep the card program

    Network receipts attach to the cards you already issue. Nothing is reissued in any country for the test.

  3. Connect its ledger

    Point Smartbills at the accounting system that entity already uses, and map its categories once.

  4. Compare evidence quality

    Count itemized receipts, not submitted expense lines. A high submission count says little about the evidence.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What people ask us before they sign up.

Yes, with an accountant view across them. Payhawk's consolidation tooling is more developed. Weigh that honestly if multi-entity reporting decides the deal.

Yes, where the merchant is on our network and the card is in a supported program. It's usually the first step teams take before changing anything else.

Payhawk, if the pain is consolidating across entities. Smartbills, if the pain is that half your spend has no usable document behind it, in any entity.

Get started

Ready to see it against Payhawk?

Bring one month of your own receipts and card transactions, and we'll show you the capture rate on both sides instead of a slide deck.